Remembering the Abstract

August 6, 2017

Q.  As someone who has had experience of working in those groups, it seems to me that most people who utilise Gurdjieff’s theory seem to be looking from a purely psychological frame. 

 

A. You're right about the psychological frame. It hit me also last night, when I was having a think about the octave & law of three, that all contemporary understanding turns the theory into a tool for personal use, for Me. 

The whole message seems to reduce it to a psychological tool for people to sort out their life & relationships etc. 

 

But what's happened to the Vastness, the Absolute, the Infinite Incommensurability? You understand this, don't you?

 

It's got to be the heart of the Work, to remind of the impersonality of the universe, which alone gives our human lives true meaning, and scale, and a measuring stave for development. They are one and inseparable -my life and the cosmos- each giving meaning to the other.

Half human is not human.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Readers of these blog musings :

Take nothing for a ‘true’ view or definitive opinion, mine or anyone else’s. All  are responses to a context, a time, a place, a query. Another time, another context, a query angled slightly differently—and another response, perhaps seeming to contradict a previous.  

But truth is present if it resonates, a process which should generate more queries…..

Featured Posts

Q:  I’d be interested in any further thoughts you have about the questions which came up in our conversation, eg What distinguishes 'spirit' from 'con...

Consciousness and Spirit: what’s the difference?

March 10, 2020

1/1
Please reload

Recent Posts

June 23, 2019

Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags